Yemen's first LGBT web site: Yemen Queer--its there but it doesn't work.
Also see:
Gay Middle East Web Site
More information
about Islam & Homosexuality
Other articles of interest
Queer
Muslim magazine: Huriyah, Barra
Gay Islam discussion groups:
Muslim Gay Men LGBT muslim
Queer Jihad Bi-muslims
Trans-muslims Lesbian muslims
1 The fallacy of same-sex unions 6/04
2 Same sex marriage: It’s about tolerance and equality 7/04
3 I wish to respond to a recent letter in the Yemen Times 8/04
4 Opposing ‘same-sex’ marriage 8/04
5 Responding to ‘same-sex’ marriage article 8/04
6 Yemeni Jihaddists Murder Three Gay Men 1/09
7 Yemen Mag Shut For Pro-Gay Article 4/10
June 24, 2004 - YemenTimes
Issue 749, Volume 13 , From 24 June 2004 to 27 June 2004
A
June 2004 commentary about same-sex marriage in the Enlgish language
newspaper 'Yemen Times' stirred up some reactions and replies--one
pro-gay and the rest anti-gay. This
debate appears to have little to do with Yemeni
society specifically.
1
The
fallacy of same-sex unions
by Paul
Kokoski - For the Yemen Times
Homosexuality is a troubling moral and social phenomenon. Due
to benign interpretations of the homosexual condition itself it is
increasingly
being viewed as something neutral or even good. Presently it threatens
to destroy the institution of marriage in Canada and the United States.
No ideology, however, can erase from the human spirit the certainty
that marriage exists solely between a man and a woman. The natural
truth about
marriage was confirmed by the Revelation contained in the biblical
accounts of creation (Gen 1:27-28. Gen:2:24) . According to consistent
biblical
testimony concerning homosexuality, there are absolutely no grounds
for considering homosexual unions to be in any way similar or even
remotely
analogous to God’s plan for marriage and family. In fact, all major
religions of the world consider homosexuality an objective disorder.
The arguments in favor of same-sex marriage are varied and betray a
lack of correct reasoning. They are little more than attempts to rationalize
without thinking rationally. Some argue that same-sex marriages are
about
tolerance and equality. As natural law implies, however, sexual orientation
does not constitute a quality comparable to race, ethnicity, gender
or age in respect to non-discrimination. An individual’s sexual orientation
is generally not known to others unless he publicly identifies himself
as having this orientation or unless some overt behavior manifests it.
Unlike race, ethnic background, sex and age, homosexual orientation is
an objective disorder and evokes moral concern. In suggesting otherwise
one is merely exploiting tolerance in the service of a particular ideology.
The equality issue begs the question, why is there not a right to allow
brothers to marry sisters and adults to marry children? More to the point,
why not allow polygamy?
A popular argument is that same-sex unions can in no way be the cause
of any injustice to others. As a civil law, however, they cannot help
but play a decisive role in shaping both the thought and behavior of
individuals and society. Legal recognition of same-sex unions would
act to obscure basic moral values causing a devaluation of the institution
of marriage. It is therefore somewhat naive to suggest, as do a number
of proponents of same-sex marriage, that religious institutions will
not be forced to perform same-sex marriages in the future if same-sex
marriage becomes law. If a government can redefine the term “marriage” they
can also redefine any existing laws to which the term marriage is related.
Where adopted children are involved in same-sex marriages, they are
deprived of the experience of either fatherhood or motherhood and hence
the opportunity
for full human development.
Men and women with homosexual tendencies must be accepted with respect,
compassion and sensitivity. It is deplorable that homosexual
persons have been and are the object of violent malice in speech or
in action.
Such treatment deserves condemnation.
Nonetheless,
homosexual acts must be considered wrong because they close the sexual act to the gift
of
life. Procreation, while not the only purpose of marriage, is nonetheless
essential to the institution. The fact that some married couples do
not have children either because of infertility or personal decision
does
not determine the purpose of marriage. Exceptions do not invalidate
but prove the rule; individual practices do not invalidate the objectives
of an institution; variations do not nullify a norm.
Marriage exists solely between a man and a woman who through their
personal gift of self to each other, perfect one another into a communion
of persons.
This human development of the spouses and the proper nurturing of children
who are the fruit of such unions makee an immense contribution to the
common good of society. One does not need to have any particular religion
to recognize this, or that the family based on marriage is the best
way to bring up happy, productive children.
In rejecting erroneous opinions that support homosexuality one does
not limit but rather defends personal freedom and dignity realistically
and
authentically understood. While the Canadian government is working to legalize same-sex marriages
I hope that lawyers and politicians of other nations will have the
greater foresight and fortitude; that they work to uphold the institution
of
marriage as it is defined and not deconstruct it to appear as merely
an expression of free love.
12th July
2004 - Yemen
Times, Issue 754, Volume 13 , From 12 July 2004 to 14 July 2004
2
Same
sex marriage: It’s about tolerance and equality
by
Christoph Lombardo Christoph_Lombardo@yahoo.com For the Yemen Times
As a gay man living in Yemen, I read with some concern Paul
Kokoski’s
commentary printed on 24 June entitled “The Fallacy of Same Sex
Unions.”
Mr. Kokoski wrote a lot in his commentary about morality and the nature
of sexual orientation, most of which seems to reflect his own personal
feelings and a rationalization of what appears to be his personal
prejudice on the subject. But what Mr. Kokoski does not mention is that gay
people do not chose to be gay any more than heterosexuals choose to be heterosexual.
I think by now we all agree that one is born straight, gay or bisexual,
and that one does not choose one’s sexual orientation anymore than
one chooses one’s gender or race. Assuming we are all creatures
of God, is it not therefore God that made us the way we are – be
it heterosexual or homosexual?
Apart from tolerance and equality (something sorely lacking in most countries
including the United States), same sex unions — or same sex marriage
if you wish to call it that — is also about equal rights under
the law, including the right to inherit property, to make communal decisions,
spousal benefits, family reunification and the right to other legal privileges
(and responsibilities) married couples have and take for granted. These
are the things gay people are struggling for through marriage or civil
union, and one day, like other minorities before us I am certain we shall
attain it.
Mr. Kokoski shows his true colors when he states that “sexual orientation
does not constitute a quality comparable to race, ethnicity, gender or
age in respect to non-discrimination.” Given the fact that we are
all creatures of God with attributes given to us by Him, on what basis
does Mr. Kokoski therefore make such a statement — his religion,
sense or personal propriety, self-righteousness or just plain bigotry?
I thank the Yemen Times for printing this rebuttal, especially given
the cultural norms of some of its readers that may run contrary to my
comments above.
Yemen
Times Issue 760, Volume 13 , From 29 July 2004 to 2 August
2004
by Paul
Kokoski paulkokoski@mountaincable.net
3
I wish to respond to
a recent letter in the Yemen Times. I have enclosed
the following letter for publication.
Regarding the letter “Same-sex marriage: It’s about tolerance and
equality” by Christoph Lombardo, (Thursday July 15th - Issue 754, Volume
13, from July 12th - July 14th, 2004)
Christoph Lombardo is incorrect in claiming that “gay people do not chose
to be gay”. Despite several scientific studies the cause of sexual attraction
between members of the same sex is unknown. The American Psychiatric Association
has, in fact, held varying positions on the subject. Nonetheless, were it to be proven that some individuals have a genetic determination
to homosexuality, in itself this evidence would not serve to invalidate the
long tradition of belief that homosexuality, according to the “natural
law”, is an unnatural or disordered condition.
“ Natural” does not, as some think, refer here simply to what is
in accord with the biological processes of man. Nor does it refer to what is
innate, nor even to what is “normal”. Rather, the word “natural” has
a metaphysical meaning. That is said to be “natural” which accords
with what is good for human beings. Homosexual
acts are contrary to the natural law because they close the sexual
act to the gift of life. They do not proceed
from a genuine affective and sexual complimentarily. Under no circumstances
can they be approved.
Hence, homosexuals should not be entitled to any legal rights as homosexuals
under civil law. Just because “we are all creatures of God”, this
does not mean that we all have the right to do as we feel or please as Mr.
Lombardo believes. This would lead to anarchy. Christoph Lombardo’s letter essentially represents a systematic effort
on the part of many today to banish religious principles from public debate;
to discount and marginalize persons with religious faith. Typical of gay rights
advocates is that they incoherently and prejudicially label those who oppose
homosexuality as “homophobic”. They fail to understand the logic
that it is possible to “love the sinner but hate the sin”.
In rejecting erroneous opinions that support homosexuality one
does not limit but rather defends personal freedom and dignity
realistically and authentically
understood.
Yemen
Times Issue 759, Volume 13 , From 29 July 2004 to 1 August 2004
4
Opposing ‘same-sex’ marriage
by
Abdulhaqq Abdullah ministry_of_truth_101@yahoo.com For the Yemen Times
I’d like to respond to the letter on same sex marriages by Mr
Christoph Lombardo, printed in the Yemen Times (issue no 754 on Monday
12th July
2004)
Firstly his presumption that ‘we all agree that one is born straight,
gay or bisexual, and that one does not choose one’s sexual orientation’ is
not only incorrect but completely misses the point. Assuming that in
one blasé statement Mr Christoph Lombard has solved the whole
nature / nurture debate – it is of no importance. Debating whether
homosexuals are born as such or are shaped by social circumstances misses
the point, and either way, the logical conclusion is one that alleviates
all responsibility from the individual, and implicitly depicts all homosexuals
as victims.
One feels obliged to exclaim out loud “ah, there, there, poor oppressed homosexual, it’s not your fault you’re gay and have had to suffer cruel subjugation all your life at the hands of an ignorant and bigoted world which refuses to understand your terrible plight and daily struggle for acceptance. You poor, poor oppressed - and by definition innocent - minority”.
However, child molesters, rapists and insane axe murderers all have just as strong a case – surely they too were either born that way or shaped by society, in neither scenario did they ‘choose’ their desires or their ‘way of life’ – are they not also victims or members of an oppressed minority group just as deserving of our sympathy?
The
point is that whether one chooses it or one feels compelled, degenerate
or
criminal behaviour is shunned and
reprimanded by society. A murderer is not absolved from blame because
he hears voices in his head, rather the criminally insane are taken
into care and criminals into custody precisely to protect everyone
from the
dangers they pose. Whether we perceive those who commit crime (or
encourage criminal activity) as being victims or criminals is far less
important
than the fact that they commit or advocate crime.
So is homosexuality a crime? Well certainly in the West homosexuality
is not a crime, on the contrary the personal and sexual freedom of
homosexuals is championed and to voice disagreement with that is
a terrible social
faux-pas. However according the three largest monotheistic
religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) homosexuality is a crime. And more
precisely, according to Yemeni law (by which Mr. Lombardo must surely
abide whilst a resident in Yemen) homosexuality is a crime.
I myself am a Muslim, and therefore hold that homosexuality
is a crime. Not because I’m a bigot, not because I have any particular prejudice
against a choice of lifestyle, or because I have any particular ‘phobia’ or
deeply hidden doubts about my own sexual identity. I understand homosexuality
to be wrong because I’m a Muslim and know that Islam forbids it – just
as Islam forbids theft, murder, the eating of port, any extra marital
sex and many other things.
By calling for tolerance of same sex marriages Mr. Lombardo implicitly
argues the irrelevance and impracticality of Islam, and the need
to separate religious teaching from ruling. It is this clandestine
propaganda
and
the effort to justify something that Islam explicitly forbade, which
is really the problem. Quite honestly I don’t care what sordid
activities Mr. Lombardo conducts in the privacy of his bedroom, whether
with animal vegetable or mineral, but when he draws public attention
to himself and seeks a public nod of approval – a society of Muslims
must say no. I wonder if the authorities in Yemen agree with myself or
with Mr. Lombardo.
August 7, 2004 - Yemen
Times
5
Responding
to ‘same-sex’ marriage article
by Ian
macdonald educayem@hotmail.com
I want to comment on the article written by Christoph Lombardo about
the same sex marriage published in Yemen Times recently. I am very surprised
to find a man who is proud of being a gay. What a shame!
My dear, you have to be proud of yourself for being a great doctor, teacher,
etc or for getting a Nobel Prize or for doing something useful for mankind,
but not for being gay nor for supporting same sex marriages. You claimed
that you were born gay, what a silly excuse! All human beings are born
natural, then some like you became gay.
You are in favor of same sex
marriage? i.e., you want a man to marry another man, how? Who will be
responsible for the family? Who will give a birth to a child, the first
man or the second? My dear, what kind of life are they going to have?
Frankly speaking, are you going to have sex with another man, and will
you let him have sex with you?
Please, you have to answer.
January 18, 2009 - Daily Queer News
6
Yemeni Jihaddists Murder Three Gay Men
by Daily Queer News - The Jawa Report
The militants appointed themselves judge, jury and executioner. The murder of the gay men is the same as the murder of the Jewish rabbi last month. In both instances, the militants justify their murder of minorities as a public service. The fanatical intolerance fostered by the neo-Salafis requires the extermination of “enemies” where enemies are defined as anyone who holds a different world view or refuses to submit to their totalitarianism. The jihaddists have growing control over various territory in Yemen that is distinct from the “ungoverned tribal regions” often noted as a security concern. The Talibanizaton of Yemen is more than a territorial expansion, its also a penetration of government structures and social mores.
Mujahideen are killing young people in Ja’ar on suspicion of sexual “irregularities” December 28, 2008 Saeed Abdullah was a young 22-year-old Hanan shot dead by the Mujahideen in the city of Abyan province Ja’ar. Well-informed sources said the victim is the third young man is killed by Mujahideen militants in the street in front of Central Market, Ja’ar. He was killed last Saturday night on allegations that the young man was gay.Sources close to the jihadists said that the leaders of the armed group is the Islamic Emirate of Ja’ar… noted that among the mujahideen, they have burned police stations and government institutions and attacked military and security patrols during the last period of smuggling and complicity by local authorities.
Lets wait for the Western outrage, it should be here any minute. Its a hate crime!
April 29, 2010 - Gay city News
7
Yemen Mag Shut For Pro-Gay Article - Ex-pat filmmaker’s review of lesbian-themed Egyptian movie sparks outrage, violent threats
by Doug Ireland
In the Arabian Peninsula nation of Yemen, the country’s only serious cultural magazine has been shut down by authorities because of an article that characterizes homosexuality as “part and parcel of our society” and advocates gay rights. The magazine, Al Thaqafiya, which is government-funded, became the subject of a wave of verbal fireworks and violent threats and exhortations this month from members of the nation’s parliament, religious leaders, and others after it published a film review by Yemeni filmmaker Hamid Aqbi, who now lives in Paris. Aqbi’s review discussed a new Egyptian film, “Heena Maysara” (“Till things get better”), which contains a lesbian love scene.
In his review of the film, Aqbi not only described homosexuality as “part and parcel of our society” but “called on the parliament to extend more rights to gay people and went as far as to suggest that the Yemeni government should consider allowing gay marriages,” according to the website MidEast News Source. As a result, on April 7, after an uproar among lawmakers about Aqbi’s article, Yemen’s parliament sent a memo to the Ministry of Communications demanding that the government shut down the magazine and investigate those responsible. Al Thaqafiya subsequently ceased publication at the insistence of authorities, and its editorial team became the target of an official investigation.
Aqbi has been the subject of death threats as a result of his article, and he has promised to take legal action against one member of the Yemeni parliament, Muhammad Al-Hizmi, whom Aqbi accuses of inciting people to murder him. Yemeni websites, which are rigorously monitored and controlled by the government, have been filled with denunciations of Aqbi and calls for his execution for “promoting pornography.” One forum even urged “our terrorist brothers” to “prepare one of their suicide operatives to wipe this malignant man off the face of the earth.”
Yemeni journalist Mohammed Al-Qadhi, who is based in Sana’a, the nation’s capital, said, “In Yemen, there is no gay community, because according to Islamic Sharia it’s prohibited. It’s a very conservative society and no one will admit that they’re gay.” According to MidEast News Source, Al-Qadhi “speculates that the editors of Al Thaqafiya apparently overlooked the article and probably did not notice how explosive its content was; otherwise it never would have gone in.”
Reviewer Aqbi told the German news agency DPA, “Those who are instigating these lies think they are agents of God on Earth. These are the same people who permit child marriages. They are blocking a law to limit the age of marriage and another law that prevents carrying weapons without legal justification or a license. They’re against women’s freedom and they are silent when it comes to government corruption.” He added, “I believe that it’s the right of any person anywhere to choose their way of life and to enjoy personal freedoms. I don’t think this warrants me being labeled a heretic and killing me.”
Writing on his excellent blog on the Arab world, Al Bab (al-bab.com), Brian Whitaker, former Middle East correspondent of the UK’s Guardian and author of “Unspeakable Love: Gay and Lesbian Life in the Middle East,” noted, “Homosexual acts are illegal in Yemen and in theory can result in execution. On the whole, the authorities are preoccupied with more pressing issues but, with little government control over much of the country, gay people are at risk from other elements taking matters into their own hands.”
Elaborating on that point, Whitaker wrote, “In 2008, three young men were killed by militants in Shabwa province on suspicion of being gay. One of them, 22-year-old Said Abdullah Hannan, was shot dead in the street in front of the main market in Jaar.”
The film review in which Aqbi made his pro-gay comments discussed a new work by one of Egypt’s leading younger directors, Khaled Youssef, a protégé of the late Youssef Chahine, who was considered Egypt’s foremost filmmaker. Chahine, known as “the pioneer of social realism” in Egyptian cinema, made several films that addressed homosexuality, most notably “Wadan Bonaparte” (“Adieu, Bonaparte,” 1985). Set in the period of the Napoleonic expedition into Egypt, the film explores the complex relationships between East and West through the prism of a homosexual French general falling in love with a local Egyptian man.
Chahine’s protégé Youssef’s “Heena Maysara,” released in Yemen in January, is set in a Cairo shantytown and tackles issues of poverty, crime, and physical and sexual abuse. The film stars two popular Egyptian actresses, Ghada Abdel-Razeq and Sumaya Al-Khashab, who portray a lesbian encounter. In the most controversial scene, Abdel-Razeq, who plays a lesbian, tries to seduce Khashab. The scene shows Abdel-Razeq hitting on Khashab — who plays a prostitute named Nahed — and kissing her. According to an article on the Dubai-based Al Arabiya television network’s website, “Religious scholars in Egypt are outraged by a lesbian scene in the new movie, telling audiences to stay away from the sinful flick and calling for the director and actresses to be prosecuted.”
A prominent Egyptian preacher and Islamic Studies professor at Cairo University, Dr. Abdel-Sabour Shahin, accused the movie of spreading homosexuality and promoting debauchery. Claiming the movie is part of “a Zionist and American conspiracy” to destroy the moral fabric of society, he called on authorities to prosecute director Youssef and the two actresses who played the lesbian scene on the big screen. Youssef, however, is not the only Egyptian film director to recently tackle the issue of homosexuality. A 2006 hit, “The Yacoubian Building” by director Marwan Hamed, based on the best-selling novel of the same name by Alaa Al-Aswany, includes a homosexual affair between a newspaper editor and a soldier. The film has become a staple of Sundance Channel programming here in the US.
Doug Ireland can be reached through his blog, DIRELAND.
FAIR USE NOTICE
The News & Reports pages on this site contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for educational purposes as part of our efforts to advance understanding of human rights issues and other matters of political, cultural and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. The pages on which these News & Reports appear contain only banners and logos for non-profit charitable groups and associations. GlobalGayz receives no revenue from them. If you wish to use copyrighted material from these News & Reports pages for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you should obtain permission from the copyright owner.
